Twenty-one kilometers of steel Armco. Twenty thousand square meters of wire fencing. Tonnes of grandstand material, all bolted onto streets that residents drove to work in January and will drive to work again in July. Today is Saturday. Hundreds of yachts are settled into Port Hercules. The Ritz-Carlton has docked its 623-foot vessel, the Evrima, in the harbor with its 149 cabins, a private chef rotation, a full spa operation, and suites running from $10,000 to over $100,000 for the weekend.

On Sunday, the cars go. On Sunday evening at 6:00 PM, the barriers start coming down. By Monday morning, most of the roads will be open.

Monaco will have run its race, earned its fee, and returned to being what it actually is: a 2.1-square-kilometer principality with a €10.3 billion GDP, zero income tax, zero wealth tax, zero capital gains, zero property levy, and twelve Formula 1 drivers who chose to live here for reasons that have nothing to do with the Mediterranean light.

Subscribe now

A Cigarette Man Needed a Permit

The story starts in 1925, with paperwork.

Antony Noghès ran the tobacco monopoly for the Grimaldi family, which gave him standing in Monaco without giving him ambitions beyond it. By 1925, he wanted to transform the Automobile Club de Monaco from a regional motoring curiosity into a recognized national body under the AIACR. This is the organization that would become the FIA. The requirement for national club status was to host an international racing event wholly within your territory.

Monaco is 2.1 square kilometers.

Noghès spent three years routing a circuit through the only streets that existed, working with Monaco’s most celebrated driver, Louis Chiron, to thread it past the harbor, up past the casino, down to the sea, through a tunnel under the Fairmont Hotel site, and back around. The Société des Bains de Mer, Monaco’s casino company with the Grimaldi family as majority stakeholders, underwrote the first race. Sixteen invited drivers appeared on April 14, 1929, racing for 100,000 French francs (~$4,000 USD at the time).

William Grover-Williams won in a Bugatti T35B, beating Rudolf Caracciola by a margin that the records have measured and history has since ignored. He would go on to win the French Grand Prix twice. He would later be recruited by the British Special Operations Executive during the Second World War, code-named Sebastian, running a resistance network outside Paris alongside two fellow racing drivers. The Nazis captured him in August 1943 and executed him at Sachsenhausen concentration camp in March 1945. He was forty-two years old and posthumously recommended for the Order of the British Empire.

The Greek Who Tried to Own It

By 1953, Aristotle Onassis had decided he wanted Monaco.

He had done this before, wanting something large and acquiring it through methods that were not quite transparent. Through Panamanian shell companies, Onassis accumulated shares in the Société des Bains de Mer until he held 52% of the company that controlled Monaco’s casino, its hotels, and its cultural infrastructure. Prince Rainier III had initially welcomed the investment. Monaco needed capital. Onassis had capital.

Their relationship deteriorated as Onassis’s vision for the principality collided with Rainier’s. Onassis wanted Monaco to remain an exclusive enclave for a small clientele of the supremely wealthy, the kind of place where 200-foot yachts anchored and nothing was built for anyone who couldn’t afford them. Rainier wanted broader tourism, more construction, and a modern state rather than a private club for the rich. Onassis, in essence, saw Monaco as an asset to be managed for returns. Rainier saw it as a country to be governed.

In June 1966, Rainier approved the creation of 600,000 new SBM shares to be permanently held by the state. Onassis’s stake collapsed from 52% to under a third overnight. He challenged the dilution in Monaco’s Supreme Court and lost in March 1967. He sold his holdings to the state for $9.5 million and left.

The Grimaldis had ruled Monaco since 1297 by disguising themselves as monks and talking their way past gate guards. Diluting a Greek shipping magnate through share creation was, historically speaking, a relatively conventional defense. They currently hold 59.47% of SBM. The company reports annual revenues of €768 million with a record €110M profit. Interesting note: the Grimaldis are the oldest ruling house in Europe.

The Wedding That Changed the Value of Everything

Through the 1940s and early 1950s, Monaco’s glamour was a regional thing. The European casino destination, with its beautiful coastline, is the sort of place wealthy French and Italians went when they wanted to gamble in clement weather. The Grimaldis were royalty in a principality most people couldn’t locate precisely on a map. Prince Rainier III understood that Monaco needed something it could not manufacture domestically.

Then he met Grace Kelly in Monaco in May 1955, while Kelly was at Cannes.

On April 18 and 19, 1956, Kelly, an American film star and Academy Award winner, twenty-six years old, married Rainier in two ceremonies broadcast live to over 30 million television viewers across nine countries via Eurovision. It was the first royal wedding ever televised. She wore 100 yards of silk net, 125-year-old rose-point lace, and thousands of tiny pearls, assembled by MGM’s costume designer Helen Rose, in a gown the studio donated because the publicity value of Grace Kelly becoming a princess was beyond what any conventional marketing budget could achieve. Kelly retired from acting permanently to do it.

Monaco’s tourism numbers climbed in the years that followed. The Grand Prix, which had run as part of the F1 World Championship since 1950, now existed inside a completely different cultural frame. Photographers who came to Monaco for the race weekend came for the race; they stayed, increasingly, for everything else. The paddock and the harbor and the terraces and the helicopters and the people who arrived on them acquired meaning that the circuit itself couldn’t generate alone.

The race became the Monaco race. That distinction, which sounds superficial, is worth approximately €10 billion in annual GDP today.

De Gaulle’s Blockade and the Tax Trap

The tax code that draws Formula 1 drivers to this square mile came out of a confrontation, not a gift.

Monaco’s zero-income-tax regime for residents predates Formula 1 as a concept. What it created, through the mid-20th century, was a steady migration of wealthy French citizens moving a short distance over the border to escape the French Republic’s tax apparatus. By the early 1960s, de Gaulle’s government was watching French capital drain toward the Riviera and had run out of patience.

In 1962, France imposed a customs blockade on Monaco. Border controls were in place on every road in and out of the principality. Monaco, which France surrounds entirely and defends by treaty, had approximately zero leverage.

The principality capitulated. On May 18, 1963, the Franco-Monegasque tax convention was signed under conditions that were, diplomatically, as close to compulsion as sovereign negotiations get.

The provision that still runs today: French nationals residing in Monaco are taxed on their worldwide income exactly as if they had never left France. Unless they established Monaco residence before October 13, 1962, and have remained continuously since. That grandfather clause is now sixty-three years old. The people it protected are mostly dead. What remains is a hard boundary that splits the paddock cleanly.

Pierre Gasly was born in Rouen. Esteban Ocon was born in Normandy. Both hold French passports. Both pay French taxes regardless of their address. The treaty de Gaulle forced on Monaco in 1963 is the reason you will not find their names on the resident list, and why the tax arithmetic that drives eleven other drivers to the same square mile simply does not apply to them.

The Colony

12 of the twenty-two drivers on the 2026 grid are Monaco residents. Charles Leclerc was born here in 1997.

Max Verstappen’s reported salary from Red Bull sits in the range of €60-70 million annually before sponsorship. For a driver at that earnings level, the UK income tax liability in a single year would approach £25 million. Over a ten-year career peak, choosing Monaco over London is a decision I venture could be worth somewhere in the range of £200 million in accumulated net wealth. The €500,000 minimum bank deposit required to establish Monaco residency, which remains in your account, accruing interest, represents less than 1% of that figure.

The 183-day minimum stay requirement is the only genuine constraint, and the Formula 1 calendar mostly satisfies it for you. F1 drivers travel more than 75,000 miles per year across 24 race weekends. Between travel days, testing, sponsor commitments, and factory visits, being physically present in Monaco for the remaining calendar nights requires no particular sacrifice.

Nice Côte d’Azur Airport is under 15 road miles away. Seven minutes by helicopter from Fontvieille. For people who commute between Bahrain, Melbourne, Silverstone, Singapore, and Las Vegas in a single season, seven minutes to one of the best-connected airports in southern Europe is just another day in the life.

Then Monaco requires written government permission for all professional photography in public spaces. In a principality where one-third of the residents are millionaires, that law has cultural weight that money cannot replicate elsewhere. Verstappen is not a celebrity in Monaco. He is a neighbor. The principality’s structural disinterest in fame is the most expensive private amenity on offer, and it costs nothing on top of the bank deposit.

The Mystique

The circuit is, by any rational modern assessment, unsuitable for Formula 1 cars.

The Circuit de Monaco runs 3.337 kilometers through streets that have not seen a meaningful change in layout since the 1986 harbor chicane was added. The cars have changed. And while the 2026 chassis regulations are far better than their predecessors, these cars are still too big for streets like Monaco.

Drivers enter the section under the Fairmont Hotel at approximately 280 kilometers per hour. They go from full Mediterranean sunlight to complete darkness in a fraction of a second. They are still adjusting when they come out the other side, back into daylight, at the track’s fastest point, with the chicane brake zone arriving less than a second later. Every driver who has described it in detail has said the same thing: there is nothing else like it in world motorsport. The sensory whiplash at those speeds, on a public road tunnel, is genuinely unlike anything the sport produces anywhere else.

And then there is the racing, which is almost entirely absent. In 2024, the top ten in qualifying finished the race in exactly that order. In 2025, the FIA mandated two pit stops per driver. Lando Norris won. The mandatory two-stop rule was subsequently withdrawn. What will 2026 bring? We’re about to find out.

None of it matters, though. 250,000+ people attend over the weekend, a record set in 2024. Hundreds of yachts fill the harbor. Every hotel room within five kilometers exceeds the cost-per-night figures most people encounter once in a lifetime, if at all.

The impossibility of real racing here is the point. The mystique requires the constriction. A Monaco where drivers could actually follow each other through the tunnel and attack into the chicane would be a different event entirely. The tension between modern machinery and ancient streets is what the broadcast sells. We’ve covered how street circuits generally interact with F1’s commercial strategy, and Monaco is the original. It’s the one every subsequent attempt is auditioning against.

What the Machine Produces

Monaco pays Formula One Management $20 million annually to host this race. Before the contract extension signed late last year, which runs through 2035 and reportedly doubled the fee to approximately $40 million, it was the lowest sanctioning fee on the entire calendar. And even at $40 million, it would still be the lowest fee.

Liberty Media accepted the discount for the same reason every smart negotiator accepts a below-market price: they were buying something the money couldn’t fully capture.

The direct economics of race weekend are staggering regardless. Monaco’s statistics office has estimated the Grand Prix contributes over €100 million to the local economy over four race days. Hotels run at 96.7% occupancy. A sea view room at the Fairmont runs €25,000 for the weekend. A terrace suite at the Hôtel Hermitage exceeds €48,000. As we’ve written before, the real hospitality margins in Formula 1 operate well above the Paddock Club tier, and Monaco is where that hierarchy becomes most visible.

A prime trackside mooring for a 50-to-59 meter superyacht costs €110,135 for the week in 2026, up 47% from €74,737 in 2019. A master suite cabin aboard one of the hundred or so yachts costs between €24,000 and €42,000 per person for the weekend, with private chef and maid service included. The Ritz-Carlton’s Evrima, at 623 feet and 149 cabins, represents the hotel industry’s recognition that Port Hercules during race week is a category that justifies sailing an entire floating hotel to Monaco once per year. Somebody running an Owner’s Suite at $100,000 is not watching the race. They are watching who else is in the harbor. The race is the reason the harbor looks the way it does.

Liberty Media will keep Monaco on the calendar as long as the Automobile Club de Monaco signs contracts, and the ACM will sign contracts until Formula 1 gives them a reason not to.

The race’s commercial identity has no substitute. When Drive to Survive transformed F1 from a European niche into a global cultural event between 2019 and 2023, Monaco was the episode that required the least explanation to new audiences. Every new fan who encountered the sport through Netflix encountered Monaco first in terms of cultural legibility, even if Silverstone, COTA, or Suzuka gave them better racing.

Liberty understands it’s running a luxury lifestyle brand, and Monaco is the original proof of concept for its authenticity. Vegas is aspirational. Miami is new. Monaco is the thing both of those venues are trying to be adjacent to.

You cannot manufacture ninety-seven years of continuous history by offering a better fee structure.

Seventy-eight times on Sunday. The most laps on the calendar, around the shortest, slowest, narrowest track in the sport. Add it all up, and the race covers about 260 kilometers, short of the 305 every other Grand Prix has to clear. The sport bends its own rulebook to keep this one.

Subscribe now

And I already know exactly what you’re going to say, because everyone says it.

You’re right. Let me say it louder than you will. I have sat through Monaco Grands Prix where the single most dramatic event was a slow pit stop, turned to whoever was in the room, and called it a masterpiece. I was lying. Overtaking here ranges from heroic to impossible. In all of 2025, under a brand-new rule forcing everyone to pit twice, the entire race saw only one legal overtake. One. Zero inside the top ten. Mercedes ran the numbers: to have even a coin-flip’s chance of passing the car ahead, you needed to be four and a half seconds a lap quicker.

That car doesn’t exist.

Max Verstappen took one look at the 2024 edition and got on the radio to say it was so boring he should have brought his pillow. Even Will Buxton, who loves the place, says the quiet part out loud: “The racing itself has never been great in Monaco.” Not lately. Not ever.

So here’s my confession, and then my line in the sand.

I make my living looking forward. By temperament and by paycheck, I am the last guy on earth who should be defending a traffic jam invented in 1929 off the coast of a tax haven.

But if you come for Monaco, I will fight you in the street.

Let me give you the why, because “tradition” is a lazy answer, and you deserve better than that.

Over the last few decades, Formula 1 has gotten safer, and thank God for it. It also got softer. The sport sanded down its corners and paved over its mistakes until a screw-up costs you a few tenths and a frown from your engineer. Run wide at most modern tracks, and you’ll find a parking lot of smooth asphalt waiting to catch you, dust you off, and hand you back. The walls moved away. Danger became a number on a screen.

Monaco never got the memo. Monaco kept the wall.

That’s the whole argument, and it lives on Saturday.

Because the secret about the crown jewel is that the jewel is qualifying. Sunday is a coronation. The pole lap is the achievement. One driver, one car, one lap, no margin, no help, the barrier a hand’s width from the wheel at every apex and a guillotine at every exit. Get it wrong, and you don’t lose a few tenths, you lose the car, the weekend, the skin off your knuckles. Fernando Alonso calls it “the best Saturday of the year,” all adrenaline and fun behind the wheel, then admits the race itself “can be a little bit boring.” Daniel Ricciardo said it better than the rest of us could: “It’s so awesomely scary and beautiful and insane and intense.”

Subscribe now

And nobody ever drove that edge like Ayrton Senna in 1988.

He was already on pole. Job done, feet up. Instead, he kept going, and the lap kept getting faster, until he was a second and a half clear of Alain Prost in the identical car. His own words, because no one has ever described the inside of greatness better than this:

Not the tunnel under the hotel. The whole circuit had become a tunnel. He scared himself so badly that he backed off and came in. A man drove clean past the edge of his own mind, and the only sane thing left to do was stop.

Then Monaco did what Monaco does. On Sunday, he led that race by almost a minute. Untouchable. On lap sixty-seven, mind drifting out front, he kissed the barrier at Portier and threw the whole thing away. He didn’t drive back to the pits. He walked to his apartment and didn’t come out for hours. The same wall that crowned him on Saturday swallowed him on Sunday.

You cannot fake that. You cannot bolt it onto a sprint race, a DRS zone, or a fan vote. It exists for one reason. The walls are real.

In 2024, a kid named Charles Leclerc, who grew up on those exact streets and spent his childhood looking down at that circuit, won his home Grand Prix and broke down on the radio, the first Monégasque to win it since Louis Chiron in 1931. You don’t get that in a parking lot in the desert. You can’t build it or buy it. It happened because a hundred years of the same impossible streets were still standing there, waiting for him.

This is why I’ve started calling Monaco the cathedral that the sport refuses to renovate. Everything else in Formula 1 sprints into the future. Aero by the millimeter, strategy by the algorithm, a calendar stuffing itself with shiny new street circuits built to look like Monaco the way a casino buffet is built to look like Italy. The machine runs flat out, forward, always. And then, once a year, it stops, takes off its hat, and drives the same lap it has since a Bugatti piloted by a man racing under a fake name won the first one. Graham Hill won it five times, and they called him Mr Monaco. Senna won it six. The track has barely moved. The royal family still watches from the same box.

Because I optimize everything. So do you. We sand the friction off our days, automate the dull parts, A/B test the wonder until it converts. The one move that keeps a person from vanishing into all that smoothness is to plant a flag on something gloriously, stubbornly inefficient and refuse to fix it. A manual gearbox in a world that shifts for you. A long lunch with no agenda. A race that flatly declines to be a good show, kept exactly because keeping it is the meaning.

So to whoever’s drafting the next proposal to take Monaco off the calendar or widen the hairpin, please, put the pen down. That corner is the slowest in the sport already, twenty-eight miles an hour at the apex, and it has never once needed your help. They ran the experiment last year. The two-stop rule was the fix, and it led teams to order one car to back up the field so the other could escape into clean air. Gone by 2026, struck from the book inside twelve months. You’re trying to fix the one race that was never broken. The procession is exactly what it’s supposed to be. The boredom is the price of admission to the only test left in the sport where a mistake still costs a human being something real.

Keep your new circuits. I’ll watch those too. I want both, the way I always want both.

Just leave the walls where they are. Leave Monaco alone.

Formula 1 is always going to chase “tomorrow”, but Monaco is the one Sunday a year it remembers it was always about a person, a machine, and a hand’s width of empty air.

Don’t you dare get rid of it.

Share

More from Business of Speed

I don’t know why I think about that ad so often, especially in today’s world, where we have AI models doing a lot of that for us.

Maybe because SAP has been a longtime client of mine, or maybe because they were on to something early.

I’ll move on to the point. Anthropic gave itself a job title at Williams: Official Thinking Partner.

Subscribe now

Every tech sponsor in Formula 1 sells compute, cloud, or connectivity. Anthropic‘s Claude is selling the cognitive work itself, which happens to be the one thing nobody has figured out how to put on a billboard.

That’s why “Pattern of Thought” exists.

The value of an AI knowledge tool is invisible. You can’t photograph an engineer reading hundreds of pages of technical regulations faster than he could last season. So, ad agency Mother strapped consumer headsets on Alex Albon, Carlos Sainz, and James Vowles, captured their reactions under pressure in the sim and at the desk, and turned that into a visual that lands on helmets and race suits in Monaco.

They sold the romance of thinking.

Williams Racing Team Principal, James Vowles came up through Mercedes’ strategy. He thinks in data, and a team clawing its way up the order has everything to gain from operational speed without the dynasty-sized ego. A hungry operation makes a better case study than a dominant one.

Every serious team now races with a tech giant in the garage. Oracle has been inside Red Bull since 2021, and this February it extended the title deal and pushed an AI strategy agent trackside; Hannah Schmitz’s strategists already run roughly 25% more race simulations thanks to the cloud behind them. McLaren went the other way with Google, training Gemini models to predict race outcomes. Ferrari runs its strategy engine on AWS, which also ingests 1.1 million data points from each car every second, generated by 300-odd sensors. The aero math is just as stark. A CFD simulation that used to take 40 days now clears in under 12 hours.

So the compute war is both settled and permanent. What’s left to win is judgment.

Since 2021, F1 has operated a cost cap set at $215 million for 2026. You can’t buy your way to the front anymore. Wind tunnel time is rationed, CFD is metered, and salaries are capped, so every team is solving one problem: more performance per regulated dollar.

A tool that lets an engineer digest a new rule, debug a model, or pressure-test a strategy in an afternoon instead of a week isn’t a gadget. It’s cost-cap arbitrage. You’re buying thinking speed in a formula that has capped almost everything except how well your people think.

That’s the real reason Williams was the right lab. Mid-grid was the point. James Vowles came up through Mercedes strategy, he thinks in data, and a team clawing up the order has everything to gain from operational speed and no dynasty-sized ego to protect.

If Anthropic can show that a full racing team moves faster by thinking with Claude, it has written a sales deck for every mid-sized enterprise watching the broadcast. And the Formula 1 calendar is the live demo.

Share

More on Business of Speed

The deal lands at a complicated moment for the house. Gucci has now posted eleven consecutive quarters of organic sales declines. Q1 2026 revenue fell 14 percent on a reported basis, with Western Europe soft, China structurally weak, and the Middle East disrupted. Kering CEO Luca de Meo has installed Demna as creative director, reset the product architecture across the portfolio, and publicly described the work ahead as a multi-year reconstruction.

Subscribe now

The F1 spend is part of that reconstruction. Gucci is buying 24 race weekends per year of paddock presence, broadcast distribution into 180+ territories, and direct exposure to one of the wealthiest, most aspirational audiences in global sport. As we covered in Conquering American Culture, the paddock has become the highest-yield luxury distribution surface money can buy at this tier. LVMH bought into the championship across multiple brands in 2024 for a reported $150M per year. Gucci just bought a single team for a third of that and got naming rights on top of that.

Against the cost of equivalent reach through paid media, runway activations, or brand ambassador rosters, the math is defensible. As an instrument for restoring cultural relevance to a brand mid-turnaround, F1 is one of the more efficient surfaces available at this price. That is the only frame under which a fashion CEO commits $150M+ to a team that has not finished higher than fourth in the constructors’ championship in over a decade.

The Briatore Factor

The deal was brokered by Flavio Briatore, Alpine’s executive advisor, and his counterpart was a man he had known for years. De Meo ran Renault Group when it owned Alpine, championed the team’s F1 entry, and only moved to Kering last year. Two operators who already knew the file, sitting on opposite sides of a deal that benefits both companies for different reasons.

Briatore has run this play before. He took over Benetton F1 in 1989 and won back-to-back drivers’ championships with Michael Schumacher in 1994 and 1995. The Italian clothing brand on the side of the car spent fifteen years in Formula 1 and walked away with two titles, a generation of brand equity, and an outsized cultural footprint for a casual-wear company. Briatore has now built two of his most visible commercial chapters around the same template: an Italian clothing brand married to the Enstone factory. Gucci is buying the kind of championship-era brand association Benetton actually earned. Briatore is betting he can deliver it again.

Alpine Needs Stability

Alpine has spent the last two years on the open market in everything but name. Otro Capital, the American PE firm with Patrick Mahomes, Ryan Reynolds, Travis Kelce, Rob McElhenney, and Rory McIlroy among its LPs, paid roughly $233M for 24 percent of the team in 2023. As we laid out in the Toto Wolff dispatch, that stake is now valued at around $750M against a team enterprise value of approximately $3 billion. Multiple buyers have circled, including Wolff himself.

A signed luxury title sponsor at this price changes the conversation. Forward revenue is now visible through 2029. The brand association moves from water treatment to one of the most recognizable houses in luxury fashion. If the team converts the Mercedes power unit into a podium-capable car over the next two seasons, the valuation argument writes itself.

What It Means for the Grid

For the rest of the paddock, the implication is more immediate. Title sponsorship is open to more than just tech and oil. McLaren signed Mastercard for the 2026 season. Williams renewed and expanded with Atlassian. Cadillac is still in the market for a title sponsor. The comp set for every 2027, 2028, and 2029 deal in negotiation now includes Gucci Racing Alpine.

Two things follow. First, mid-tier teams negotiating their next title deal have a defensible upward floor. As we documented in the Fan Prix piece last summer, premium F1 title partnerships were priced between $30M and $70M per year.

Second, sponsorship at the very top of the grid (Mercedes, Red Bull, Ferrari, McLaren) becomes harder to discount. The luxury cohort has now demonstrated willingness to pay for a fifth-place team. The premium attached to a championship-contending team is, by definition, higher.

Two things I think are worth pointing out.

One: Gucci is not buying Alpine’s racing program. Gucci is buying access to the F1 audience for a brand mid-restructuring, on terms set by a CEO who knows the property because he used to run it. The F1 paddock has become the most reliable cultural distribution platform in luxury, and Kering needed one for the back half of de Meo’s reconstruction plan.

Two: Briatore has now built two of his most visible commercial chapters around the same template, an Italian clothing brand married to the Enstone race team. Benetton in the 1990s walked into Formula 1 as a casual-wear company and walked out with championships. Gucci in the 2020s is buying the same kind of brand association before the team has earned it. Briatore is betting he can deliver again. Given his record at this factory, the better question is whether anyone should bet against him.

Share

Italy hadn’t produced a repeat Grand Prix winner in over 70 years, since Alberto Ascari, and Giancarlo Fisichella’s 2006 win in Malaysia was the last time an Italian stood on the top step at all. An entire generation of Italian motorsport fans grew up rooting their national pride through Ferrari’s marque because there was nobody else to carry it.

Subscribe now

Sunday changed that, and when Antonelli cleared the barriers in parc fermé to find his parents, even the drivers who’d just finished behind him sought him out. Verstappen, both Cadillac drivers, and Franco Colapinto were all walking over with hugs. The paddock was telling you something.

Pair that with Jannik Sinner holding the world’s top tennis ranking at the same moment, and Italy has a cultural sports story it hasn’t had in a long time, two generational talents in two different sports running concurrently, neither of them appearing particularly burdened by what they’re carrying. And with the men’s Italian national soccer team missing a third straight World Cup, the time is now for both Sinner and Antonelli.

Antonelli said Thursday that he was aware of the historical pressure but wasn’t trying to focus on it. Watch the press conference footage, and you believe him.

The race earned him something that the first three couldn’t

McLaren brought a meaningful upgrade to Miami, enough for Norris to beat Antonelli in Saturday’s sprint and spend the second half of Sunday with a legitimate shot at the lead. Antonelli dropped two positions at the start due to a grip problem; Toto Wolff later called it a team mistake. He fought his way back through Charles Leclerc, passed Norris on Lap 28, and then spent the closing stages defending, with a gearbox issue developing around Lap 33 and rear tire temperatures spiking four laps later. Peter Bonnington, who spent years talking Lewis Hamilton through equivalent moments from the same radio seat, brought him back lap by lap, and by Lap 40, Antonelli’s voice had settled.

The first three wins came with a car that made the driver’s job manageable. Miami had the advantage compressed, meaning the question of whether Antonelli is a product of Mercedes or a genuine championship-level driver is effectively answered.

Inside the garage, Russell is navigating something uncomfortable

He finished fourth, admitting to Sky Sports F1 that he spent the final ten laps running Antonelli’s differential and brake bias settings after struggling all weekend with a setup that didn’t suit his style, and called the impact bigger than he expected. Russell is 20 points back, won in Canada last year, and has flagged Montreal as a circuit where he expects to recover ground. Antonelli, unprompted in the post-race press conference, said the same thing about his teammate.

Wolff is threading a needle that tightens with every Antonelli win, praising the younger driver publicly while immediately noting Russell’s competitive threat and framing the starts as a team-level problem rather than an individual one. Mercedes leads the constructors’ championship by 68 points, and the starts genuinely need fixing. Wolff called them unacceptable for a team with title ambitions, and he’s right about that.

The viewing data is where the commercial stakes become real

The 2026 regulations have created a problem Liberty Media did not budget for. Spain’s DAZN recorded a 49% year-over-year audience drop after the Japanese Grand Prix, France’s Canal+ fell 43%, Germany lost 21%, and Austria shed 36%. These are not rounding errors in peripheral markets. France and Spain are two of the sport’s historically central territories, and the collapse in combined viewership across those four countries represents a direct threat to the broadcast rights valuations that underpin F1’s revenue model.

To understand why that matters financially, start with the top line. F1 generated $3.87 billion in revenue in 2025, with media rights fees accounting for 31.3% of that total and live viewership up 21% compared to 2024. Sponsorship alone contributed $840.4 million, up sharply from $634.5 million in 2024. The sport’s commercial model is built on audience scale, which justifies rights fees, which in turn justify sponsor pricing, reinforcing the cycle. A sustained decline in viewership in Europe puts pressure on every layer of that stack when broadcast contracts come up for renewal.

Italy is the single exception. Sky Sports Italia drew 824,000 viewers for the Japanese Grand Prix, up 36% over the same race in 2025, with Antonelli entering that weekend as the first Italian driver with a genuine shot at the championship since Michele Alboreto in 1985. That number didn’t happen because the 2026 regulations suddenly became popular in Bologna. It happened because Italy finally has a driver, and the market responded immediately and measurably.

For Liberty Media’s commercial team, Italy’s counter-trend is both a proof of concept and a product brief. Driver-market correlation is the mechanism they’ve used to grow audiences since Drive to Survive: Verstappen built the Netherlands, Norris accelerated the UK’s younger demographic, and Colapinto lit up Latin America overnight. What I’m calling the “Antonelli effect” has reignited national attention in Italy around a new protagonist in ways no marketing campaign could replicate, even as Italy was already engaged through Ferrari. The additive effect of a national title contender at a rival team is commercially distinct from Ferrari loyalty. It creates new entry points.

Mercedes, the direct beneficiary, is already the sport’s most commercially valuable constructor. SponsorUnited’s latest data puts Mercedes-AMG Petronas at an estimated $558 million in sponsorship revenue in 2025, leading all ten teams, with the average F1 sponsorship deal worth roughly $6 million, approximately eight times the average NFL team deal. Their Advertising Value Equivalent, which measures the media exposure delivered to commercial partners, reached $5.7 billion in 2024, up 8% year over year. Three wins into a dominant 2026 campaign, with a 19-year-old Italian leading the drivers’ championship, those AVE numbers are compounding in real time.

The contract structure underneath all of this is worth understanding. Antonelli is currently earning a reported $2 million base salary in 2026, and he is contracted through 2029, which means the renegotiation conversation isn’t imminent, but the market comparison already exists.

When Charles Leclerc won back-to-back in Belgium and Italy in 2019, his base salary reportedly moved from around $12 million to $30 million within two years. Antonelli is two years younger than Leclerc was at that moment, already has more wins, and is at the sport’s most commercially active team. The salary structure is management’s problem to solve in 2027. The endorsement value is a problem for every brand that didn’t sign him in 2025. [Note: salary figures above are estimates from third-party sources; neither Mercedes nor Antonelli’s camp has confirmed specific contract terms publicly.]

Across the sport, F1 team sponsorship reached $2.54 billion in 2025, a 22.1% increase that has closed the gap to the NFL, which leads at $2.66 billion, to just $120 million. F1 surpassed the English Premier League. That trajectory runs directly through narratives like this one: a young driver from a historically passionate market, winning in his second season, carrying a national story that every broadcaster on the continent can sell. The 2026 regulatory headwinds are real, and Liberty Media is under genuine pressure to fix the on-track product in several European markets. Antonelli gives them cover they didn’t plan for and leverage they’ll use, whether they acknowledge it explicitly or not.

Eighteen races remain. Russell will be competitive in Canada, McLaren will keep pushing, and the starts need fixing before a reliability or tactical error costs Antonelli points he shouldn’t be losing. None of that changes what the Italian audience data through four rounds already confirms, or what happens to Mercedes’ $558 million commercial portfolio if this championship run extends to July.

The sport needed a story that could hold European audiences while the regulations were sorted out. One arrived on schedule, wearing number 12, and collecting the chequered flag in South Florida.

Share

A big thanks to all of our subscribers, especially our Founding Members, for their continued support.

Founding Members: Andy Amendola, Web Smith, Alex Nunez, Hannah Elliot, Mark Boudreau, John LePore, Josh Felber, Marshall Pruett, Blake Plumley

Corporate Members: T-Mobile for Business, Electranet Inc., Bloomfield AI, HYTON

Upgrade Subscription Now

Field Notes - Miami Grand Prix

Thanks to our clients at Hyton, we had the opportunity to experience The Concours Club both at the Miami GP track and back at the club itself, located at the Opa Locka Executive Airport. We’ll write more about it in the coming weeks, but for now, here are some of the photos from the weekend.

This newsletter is made possible through the support of our subscribers and our partners. When you support our partners, you’re supporting independent media like Business of Speed. We recently had Omologato founder, Shami Kalra, on the podcast. Use partner code BOS10 on your Omologato purchase to let them know we sent you.

Subscribe now

Apple Continues Building a Content Stack Around Its F1 Rights

The race is almost secondary.

Before a wheel turns in Miami this weekend, Apple has built an entire layer of original programming around its Formula 1 broadcast rights, and the talent it selected reveals exactly what the company thinks it’s building.

Circuits in Focus debuts April 30, pairing 2016 F1 World Champion Nico Rosberg with racing driver and YouTuber Emelia Hartford. The two analyze the track strategy and braking points using EA Sports F1 25, which turns a video game into a legitimate broadcast analysis tool and quietly co-promotes EA’s latest racing title to every F1 fan watching, a three-way arrangement dressed up as a television show.

The POV takes a completely different approach. Former Red Bull Racing technician Calum Nicholas and engineer Christina Roki run a post-race social series reacting to key moments and strategic decisions, two people who actually sat inside an F1 operation, describing what they saw in terms that make the sport legible to someone watching their third race ever.

The Tubi arrangement deserves attention. The Fast Lane: Miami runs on Fox’s free ad-supported platform, with YouTuber Michelle Khare, Jeremiah Burton, and F1 instructor Scott Mansell providing live commentary from a creator-centered perspective. Apple routes the premium experience behind its $12.99/month Apple TV+ paywall and pushes the influencer-adjacent content to a service that costs viewers nothing. That’s audience expansion by design, and coordinating it with Fox signals an unusual degree of alignment between two companies otherwise competing for the same living room.

Apple’s physical footprint around the race is just as deliberate. On May 1, the Aventura store becomes a full-day race venue, with oversized screens and stadium seating for Practice and Sprint Qualifying, a live performance by DJ Dímelo Flow, and an Apple Books conversation with Susie Wolff about Driven, her memoir on building a career inside a sport that spent years making clear she wasn’t welcome.

The Cadillac F1 special livery is on display, a well-placed reminder that the sport’s new American team exists, at an event specifically designed to grow F1’s American audience. Sergio Pérez, now driving for Cadillac, shares a personal playlist through Apple Music.

More than 50 IMAX locations nationwide are screening the Miami Grand Prix live, and Apple is running a public viewing of the race day in Times Square. Theatrical chains and streaming services have spent years in a low-grade war over the same eyeballs. Apple is routing a live F1 broadcast through IMAX infrastructure, which is a different kind of arrangement, and the Times Square screening makes the same point from street level: Apple wants race day to feel like something people show up for.

Talent architecture reveals Apple’s theory of long-term retention. Rosberg carries
championship credibility. Hartford brings accessibility and a female broadcast presence to a sport where the commentary booth has historically been narrow. Nicholas and Roki provide the technical granularity that converts a casual viewer into someone who actually understands what they just watched, which is the version of that viewer who clears their calendar the following Sunday.

Apple’s F1 deal spans a decade. Original programming is how a ten-year contract becomes a habit rather than a scheduled event, and getting someone to open Circuits in Focus on a Thursday afternoon builds a fundamentally different relationship with the sport than selling them a Sunday broadcast slot. The rights get you in the room. The programming, the store takeovers, IMAX partnerships, and public screenings are what keep people there.

Whether any of these specific formats survive long enough to compound is the real test. Creator talent moves. Production costs stack across ten seasons. Building a sustained audience for sports analysis content is genuinely hard. But the underlying logic of layering original content and physical presence around expensive rights is sound, and the mix of championship pedigree (Rosberg), technical credibility (Nicholas and Roki), and creator-economy reach (Khare, Hartford, Burton) suggests Apple is at least asking the right questions. Which of these formats gets renewed at the end of 2026 will tell you what Apple actually learned.

Share

Barilla Made a Pasta for Race Day

Angie Cotter, Barilla’s U.S. pasta category marketing director, launched Racing Wheels this week: a special-edition pasta cut shaped like an F1 wheel, ridged and circular, built for al dente texture and sauce pickup. Available on Walmart.com now, with broader retail through spring. Race weekend activation at the Miami Grand Prix includes two Lasagna Bars on-site and dishes in the Paddock Club.

Barilla holds the title of Formula 1’s official pasta partner, and Cotter’s team decided to build a product with it. Racing Wheels is a new SKU that exists because of the F1 relationship: it costs $1.17, it sits in a grocery aisle, and it puts the partnership in someone’s kitchen. That kind of move is rare in motorsport sponsorship, where the default is signage, hospitality access, and a logo on the broadcast.

The campaign wrapping it is called “Domenica Italiana,” built on the Italian tradition of Sunday meals shared while watching the race. It works because it describes what people already do on race Sundays.

Every food and beverage brand on the F1 grid should study what Cotter’s team built and ask the same question: what artifact of the partnership lives outside the circuit and inside someone’s daily life? Barilla’s answer is on Walmart.com right now and will be in Miami in three weeks.

Share

This dispatch brought to you by Omologato UK

This newsletter is made possible through the support of our subscribers and our partners. When you support our partners, you’re supporting independent media like Business of Speed. We recently had Omologato founder, Shami Kalra, on the podcast. Use partner code BOS10 on your Omologato purchase to let them know we sent you.

F1 had just announced revenue rising 14% to $3.87 billion in 2025. Shanghai was selling out tickets and hospitality as China’s expanding middle class and Gen Z caught the F1 bug.

Yet, as Thomas wrote, brand sponsorship from China has “slowed to a trickle,” with Lenovo standing “almost alone” as a major Chinese global F1 partner and no team on the grid currently carrying a major Chinese name. Thomas was at the first Chinese Grand Prix in 2004 and was part of the commercial gold rush that followed. His framing of “full grandstands, growing fanbase, empty sponsor pipeline” stuck with me, and I wanted to understand the structural reasons behind it.

Then the race happened, and everything he described played out in real time. 230,000 people attended the 2026 Chinese Grand Prix. They packed Metro Line 11 in Ferrari red caps and McLaren papaya tees, carrying handmade banners, some with Labubu dolls dressed as their favorite drivers dangling from their backpacks. Lewis Hamilton, who has raced in Shanghai for two decades, said he had never seen crowds that large.

Tickets across every price tier, from ¥330 ($45) practice day passes to ¥42,800 ($5,860) premium packages, sold out, and gate revenue hit ¥190 million ($26 million), up 35% from last year. After the weekend, Thomas posted again, writing that sales records were smashed across sponsorship, ticketing, hospitality, merchandise, and concessions, with “literally not a free seat in the house.”

Subscribe now

Where the Money Went Instead

China generates close to $20 trillion in annual GDP, and around 130 Chinese firms sit in the Fortune Global 500. Nielsen reports Chinese F1 fandom grew 39% year over year. Over half of fans in the country discovered the sport in the past four years, and the audience skews young with a 50/50 gender split, a demographic profile that should have every sponsorship broker in the paddock on a plane to Shanghai.

F1 generated $3.65 billion in total revenue in 2024, and its global partner roster has nearly tripled since 2020, from 12 to 31. LVMH signed a 10-year global deal. American Express, LEGO, Sony, and Santander all entered.

More than 110 U.S. brands now sponsor F1, more than double the figure from 2017, and forty-five percent of McLaren’s 57 sponsors are American. The world’s second-largest economy contributes one name to that roster, and the reason has far more to do with how F1 sells than with whether Chinese companies are buying.

Put the 2004 and 2026 numbers side by side, and the reversal becomes clear: two decades ago, the arrival of F1 in Shanghai triggered a wave of Chinese commercial interest that Thomas described as a gold rush with “some pretty hefty deals” getting signed across the paddock. The fanbase today dwarfs what existed then, the sport’s global revenue has multiplied several times over, and Chinese corporate presence in F1 has moved in the opposite direction.

Chinese Brands Are Choosing Different Global Sports

The idea that Chinese companies haven’t figured out international sports sponsorship is easy to believe if you only look at the F1 grid.

Look wider, and the picture changes fast.

Five Chinese companies, Ant Group, Hisense, AliExpress, Vivo, and BYD, served as official global sponsors of UEFA Euro 2024, accounting for a third of the tournament’s entire sponsor pool. Alibaba holds a top-tier Olympic partnership running through 2028. Hisense has been embedded in FIFA and UEFA cycles for the better part of a decade and reported a 274% year-over-year sales surge during the 2018 World Cup in Russia. BYD replaced Volkswagen as UEFA’s official vehicle supplier and, in February 2026, Stella Li traveled to Manchester to personally finalize a multi-year deal making BYD the official automotive partner of Manchester City, following an earlier partnership with Inter Milan.

These are substantial commitments. The money exists. The appetite for global platforms exists. What Chinese companies have repeatedly and deliberately chosen are properties with massive single-event reach, concentrated activation windows, and straightforward ROI measurement. A month-long football tournament with 5 billion cumulative viewers and a fixed host market is a different proposition than a 24-race global calendar that requires year-round activation across 180+ broadcast territories. Thomas, who has watched this dynamic play out from Shanghai for more than two decades, identified the core tension on LinkedIn: F1’s commercial model remains “too Western-centric” while Chinese brands continue to prioritize domestic digital platforms, short-form media, and performance-driven spend.

Matthew Marsh, an F1 sponsorship broker covering Asia, told Autosport that Chinese company leadership approaches sponsorship like a commodity purchase, evaluating it the way they’d evaluate a shipment of steel, with a focus on measurable returns. The Apple model of building margin through brand association and long-term equity hasn’t taken hold in most Chinese boardrooms, and that framing clashes with how F1 partnerships actually function, which is largely through compounding brand presence over multiple seasons, hospitality relationships, and the soft power of being seen inside a global entertainment property week after week.

Jason Du, GM of global brand marketing at Join-Cheer Digital Group, which works directly with Chinese EV brands on overseas campaigns, told The Current that increased global marketing spend from Chinese companies is inevitable, given how saturated the domestic automotive market has become. The question was never whether the money would move outward. The question is which platforms capture it first, and F1 has been losing that race to football for years.

The Activation Gap in Shanghai

Look at the race week activation schedule in Shanghai during the 2026 Chinese Grand Prix. F1 teams sent their drivers all over the city to front brand events. Max Verstappen appeared at an ExxonMobil event alongside actor Daniel Wu. Charles Leclerc visited a PUMA store. Fernando Alonso showed up at the BOSS flagship in Jing’an. George Russell and Kimi Antonelli hosted an IWC Schaffhausen event at Taikoo Hui. Jiemian News, one of China’s most prominent business outlets, covered the full circuit of appearances, and every brand the drivers were activating for was Western.

The commercial infrastructure of F1 in China is designed to serve sponsors who already exist, all of whom are based outside the country. Nobody from the teams is building relationships with Chinese corporate leadership on Chinese terms, using Chinese commercial logic, through Chinese digital platforms.

F1 poured enormous energy into its American expansion, and Liberty Media invested years of strategic effort into understanding how American brands think, what American audiences consume, and how to build a commercial bridge between the two. That pipeline brought in more than 110 U.S. sponsors. No one has attempted anything comparable in China, and the difference shows in every race week activation schedule Shanghai produces.

F1’s Growth Engine Doesn’t Reach This Market

Drive to Survive is the single most effective fan-acquisition tool F1 has ever deployed, and Netflix penetration in China is zero. The show simply doesn’t exist in the market. The F1 movie starring Brad Pitt pulled ¥328 million ($44.9 million) at the Chinese box office, a solid number that still accounts for only a fraction of its global $633 million haul. Tencent signed a multi-year broadcast renewal through 2027 to carry every race, and CCTV has expanded coverage, but the storytelling pipeline that converted casual viewers into obsessive fans across the U.S. and Europe hasn’t been replicated on Douyin, Bilibili, Xiaohongshu, or any other Chinese platform.

Without a Chinese-language content ecosystem that builds emotional connection to drivers, teams, and paddock culture, fandom stays broad and shallow.

There is also no emotional anchor on the grid. Zhou Guanyu, the first full-time Chinese driver in F1, raced for Alfa Romeo and Sauber between 2022 and 2024, and when Frederic Vasseur signed him, he publicly dismissed the idea that the move was commercially motivated. He also later admitted to Autosport that tapping into the Chinese market had been “difficult” even with Zhou in the car. SenseTime and Yili both came on board during Zhou’s tenure, and both are gone now that he’s been reduced to a reserve role at the Cadillac F1 Team.

The Ground Is Moving Faster Than the Paddock

The most interesting commercial signal from the 2026 Chinese Grand Prix came entirely from outside the paddock. Taobao Instant Commerce, Alibaba’s on-demand delivery platform, became an official race partner through a sequence that F1’s commercial team should study. Last August, the company redesigned its delivery rider uniforms in orange and black, and Chinese internet users immediately spotted the resemblance to McLaren’s livery. The comparison went viral, the company leaned into the moment, and a partnership with the Chinese Grand Prix followed.

That deal was born of organic cultural momentum on Chinese social media, and it reveals how commercial energy actually moves in this market. Chinese consumers are ready to connect brands with the sport when the connection operates on their terms, through shareable identity, cultural resonance, and a logic that ties back to something measurable rather than abstract brand equity.

China Daily reported on a broader consumer shift that accelerated during COVID, away from conspicuous luxury consumption and toward health, lifestyle, and premium experiences. Their reporter described fans on Metro Line 11 wearing full team kits, carrying homemade signs, treating the race weekend as a destination event in a way that looks more like what F1 has cultivated in Austin and Miami than the corporate-hospitality model of a decade ago. F1 as a live experience fits that shift, and the commercial opportunity attached to it remains almost entirely untapped.

Share

BYD Is Coming

Stella Li attended the Abu Dhabi Grand Prix last December and was in the Shanghai paddock last week. In 2025, she became the first woman and first representative of a Chinese brand to be named World Car Person of the Year. She is the person most directly responsible for BYD’s international expansion, and she is spending time in F1 paddocks.

BYD is already the largest electric vehicle seller in Europe by unit volume, operates in more than 110 countries, and has built a production facility in Hungary. Its sports sponsorship portfolio now spans UEFA Euro 2024, Manchester City, and Inter Milan. Huu-Hoi Tran, managing director and global VP at Capgemini Invent China, told The Current that Chinese EV brands like BYD have the superior product but need to integrate themselves into consumer consciousness in new regions, and Prof. Holger Görg of the Kiel Centre for Globalization told the South China Morning Post that sports sponsorship helps Chinese brands appear “less threatening” in European markets where they face persistent perception barriers around quality and market competition.

So far, BYD has deployed that strategy through football. Motorsport.com reported this month that the company is now actively assessing F1 entry options, from team acquisition to a 12th entry application to a title sponsorship modeled on what Alfa Romeo did with Sauber for six seasons. The Geely Group, which controls Lotus, Volvo, and Polestar, attempted to acquire a team two years ago and was priced out by the surge in F1 valuations, though a title sponsorship remains on their table.

What makes BYD’s entry feel inevitable rather than speculative is the convergence of several forces. The 2026 regulations shift F1 toward a 50/50 split between electric and combustion power, making the sport far more relevant to an EV manufacturer’s narrative.

The Chinese consumer base is already engaged. BYD has entered the growth phase where purely domestic brand investment hits diminishing returns. And behind BYD sit 10 to 20 more Chinese EV brands preparing to compete internationally, all of which will eventually need to differentiate against each other on something other than price and will run out of UEFA and FIFA inventory before they get there.

Revolut’s deal with Audi showed what a modern F1 partnership looks like when the partner embeds itself into the team’s operational infrastructure rather than buying logo space, and Toyota’s embedded approach with Haas offers another template built on lower risk, high learning, and room to scale. BYD is sophisticated enough to study both models and build something that aligns with Chinese commercial priorities rather than imitating a Western playbook designed for companies with a different relationship to brand equity.

The Call

F1 is running a global commercial operation that has cracked the U.S., consolidated Europe, and aggressively expanded into the Middle East, but it has not built the muscle to compete in China. The partnership model assumes sponsors already think in terms of long-term brand equity, that they want global category exclusivity across 180+ broadcast territories, and that they’re comfortable spending $30 to $70 million per year for a position on a car they can activate at 24 race weekends across five continents.

That model works for LVMH, HP, and Oracle, but it does not work for Chinese companies that operate primarily in domestic markets, prioritize measurable return on investment, and view marketing as performance-driven spend. Thomas laid out what the alternative looks like on LinkedIn: China-first commercial strategies, modular sponsorship models, localized digital and social solutions, and deeper integration with Chinese tech and commerce platforms. That list should be pinned to the wall of every team’s commercial office. Teams need on-the-ground leads in Shanghai and Shenzhen year-round, not executives who fly in for race week and leave, and F1 itself needs content creation pipelines in Mandarin that do what Drive to Survive did in English.

BYD will enter F1. When it does, it will open the door for a wave of Chinese EV brands behind it, just as Liberty Media’s American expansion turned a trickle of U.S. sponsors into a flood. The question is whether F1 will be ready to receive them with something more than the same pitch deck it uses in London and New York, or whether 230,000 fans will keep filling the grandstands while the commercial model stays a decade behind the audience it already has.

Share

This is the kind of analysis we publish every week at Business of Speed, with a point of view on where the money is actually moving in motorsport. If you're not subscribed yet, you should be. We have a limited number of sponsorship slots available for the newsletter and podcast. Reach out at ciao@bizofspeed.com, and if you're a brand or rights holder looking at motorsport and want help making the investment work harder, that's the other side of what we do.

• 🎲 The Vegas Effect

• 🏎️ The Calculated Dismantling of Racing’s Old Guard

• ✨ How Formula 1 Turned Vegas into its Most Expensive Billboard

If someone forwarded you this email, consider supporting independent coverage and analysis of the business of Formula 1.

Subscribe now

Money talks in motorsport. Numbers tell stories. Formula 1's transformation from a male-dominated spectacle to a gender-balanced entertainment phenomenon represents a shift in sports business paradigms.

Nielsen Sports reports that F1 has accumulated 750 million fans worldwide. Women constitute 41% of this base, and the fastest-growing segment is women aged 16 to 24.

This demographic evolution mirrors broader changes in consumer spending patterns, with women projected to control 75% of global discretionary spending by 2029.

Motorsport, Fashion, and Streetwear

The transformation extends into retail ecosystems. Independent ventures like Two Girls 1 Formula generated $100,000 in revenue by addressing gaps in official team merchandise. The market exposes limitations in current offerings. Helena Hicks, founder of Females in Motorsport, notes team merchandise remains "male-heavy" with limited options for women.

Consumer demand outpaces product evolution.

Puma attempts solutions through collaboration with A$AP Rocky, creating unisex collections. The initiative represents broader industry recognition of market gaps. Traditional luxury partnerships persist—LVMH signed a decade-long agreement, Tommy Hilfiger maintains its Mercedes relationship—yet new categories emerge.

Take Sherry Ma's Grandstand Project, which crystallizes broader market shifts.

Her venture, sparked by personal frustration with existing merchandise options, mirrors Formula 1's cultural evolution from pure motorsport to a lifestyle brand.

Ma's trajectory from business student to F1 fashion entrepreneur represents market correction in action. Her insight—that female fans seek statement pieces for race weekends rather than standard team merchandise—highlights the gap between traditional motorsport retail and contemporary consumer demands. The project's focus on race-specific collections, launching with Las Vegas-themed pieces, demonstrates an understanding of F1's event-driven commerce potential.

The venture's authenticity stems from community integration. Ma recruits models from car meets, includes TikTok content creators, and partners with Car Girls of Los Angeles. This grassroots approach contrasts with top-down corporate merchandise strategies. Her commitment to donating 3% of proceeds to women's motorsport initiatives positions the business within broader industry transformation narratives.

Mascara Money’s Moment

The beauty sector leads F1's commercial metamorphosis, transforming sponsorship models through what I'm calling "mascara money" - the intersection of cosmetics capital and motorsport marketing. This evolution mirrors F1's dramatic demographic shift, with Nielsen Sports data confirming that over 300 million female fans worldwide and that women comprise 41% of the global fanbase. Most notably, the fastest-growing segment comprises women aged 16-24, representing a seismic shift in the sport's cultural positioning.

Rimmel, a UK beauty powerhouse, strategically aligned with F1 Arcade, while Charlotte Tilbury made history as the first female-founded company to partner with F1 Academy.

This invasion of the beauty sector isn't coincidental - it corresponds with broader market intelligence, showing that women will control 75% of discretionary spending by 2029, creating an imperative for brands to establish authentic connections with female consumers.

American brands Anastasia Beverly Hills and e.l.f. opted for direct driver sponsorship, backing Bianca Bustamante and Katherine Legge, respectively. These partnerships represent more than mere logo placement - they signal fundamental shifts in motorsport's commercial DNA, reflecting what F1 Academy Managing Director Susie Wolff calls "authenticity behind trying to create positive and impactful change in the sport."

Wolff orchestrates this convergence of beauty and speed with strategic precision. Her initiative secured partnerships that transcend traditional motorsport boundaries, with American Express deploying car livery as a canvas for women-owned businesses - a move that produced emotional resonance when South Florida kitchen Caja Caliente's owner saw her logo on a global stage. This exemplifies what Wolff describes as "packages which can be commercially very interesting for partners."

The upcoming Netflix docuseries, slated for 2025, promises to crystallize this narrative shift. Wolff's self-described "bold and disruptive" approach, with three additional "dream partners" pending announcement, suggests beauty's gravitational pull in F1 continues to strengthen. This aligns with broader industry trends - the average F1 team sponsorship deal has jumped from $2.87 million in 2019 to $5.08 million in 2024, indicating growing commercial confidence in the sport's diverse appeal.

Market metrics validate this strategy. More than Equal's research reveals a stark contrast: female fans are 50% likely to support women's sports sponsors, dwarfing male fans' 0.1% conversion rate.

Il Makiage's Arsenal Women partnership serves as a proof-of-concept, driving 33% growth in brand preference since 2022.

These numbers illuminate a paradox: while traditional motorsport sponsorship pursued male demographics, the beauty sector identified untapped commercial potential in female fandom. As Hicks notes, F1 needs to "improve on its offerings for women and look at how it can market itself."

For Wolff, success isn't merely about getting women drivers into Formula One - it's about "challenging their perception that it's a man's world" and demonstrating that "this sport has opportunities for women, either on track or off track." The beauty sector's growing influence suggests this vision is already materializing, powered by brands that recognize the commercial and cultural value of authentic female engagement in motorsport.

The mascara money phenomenon reshapes not just sponsorship strategies but F1's fundamental relationship with its evolving audience.

Share

Commercial Shift

The commercial implications manifest in sponsorship structures.

The average F1 team partnership deal has increased from $2.87 million in 2019 to $5.08 million in 2024. Contract durations shortened from 5.2 years to 3.2 years, creating space for brand rotation and market testing. IT companies now represent 20% of F1 sponsorship spending, up from 3% in 2019. Financial services grew from 2% to 17%.

Title partners of top teams generate an average media value of $6 million per race. Teams redesign sponsorship packages. Brands recalibrate marketing strategies. The sport's guardians balance tradition with evolution. Female engagement creates pressure for infrastructure changes, including security measures, facility design, and event planning.

Further, this transformation also suggests broader implications for sports business models. F1's adaptation to changing demographics provides a blueprint for other series. The intersection of fashion, beauty, and motorsport creates new commercial territories. Traditional sponsors face competition from sectors previously considered peripheral to racing.

Geographic expansion accompanies these demographic shifts. Saudi Arabia reports 11% fan growth, with a 22% increase among viewers aged 50-69. The UAE shows a 6% increase. European strongholds maintain momentum, including the UK up 2.3%, and Germany rising 4.5%.

Netflix's Drive to Survive influences persist, with 35% of viewers indicating increased race viewership intention. One in four fans credits the series for their initial interest.

But there are still challenges.

The sport relies on drivers' personalities to drive engagement. Marketing strategies require refinement. Infrastructure needs modernization. The commercial opportunity presented by female fans remains partially unrealized. Critics suggest that over-reliance on specific demographics risks market instability.

The numbers indicate a future where gender diversity drives commercial success. Ultimately, money talks. F1's adaptation to this reality may provide a blueprint for other sports seeking a similar transformation.

The billion-dollar question remains: Will the sport's infrastructure evolve at pace with its audience?

Leave a comment

In case you missed it, Charles Leclerc won his home race in Monaco last week. It might be one of the most unanimously beloved home wins in recent memory. And while the race might be a bit of a procession these days, qualifying is always epic. An actual battle of man versus machine versus narrow street.

New sponsors are entering F1 and partnering with the teams, most recently and notably the HP x Ferrari title partnership. But McLaren continues to make moves through partnership extensions and impressive displays.

Let’s dive in.

Subscribe now

What OKX Actually Gets From Its McLaren Deal

As Formula One continues its tremendous rise, partners like OKX are strategically positioning themselves to capitalize on this momentum and improve their brand reputation.

Ahead of the Monaco Grand Prix, OKX unveiled a special tribute to Ayrton Senna with the McLaren F1 Team, showcasing their strong partnership.

Ahead of the 2024 Monaco Grand Prix, OKX and McLaren rolled out a one-off livery honoring Ayrton Senna, painting the MCL38 in the yellow, green, and blue of his iconic helmet. Thirty years after his death, at the circuit where he won six times, the second-largest crypto exchange by trading volume turned a heritage play into a global brand-building exercise.

That livery got attention. The business logic underneath it deserves more.

The Monaco Calculation

OKX CMO Haider Rafique has been threading a specific needle since the partnership began: how does a crypto exchange borrow credibility from a sport that trades on engineering precision and generational legacy? Monaco is where that question gets answered most directly. For one weekend, the principality becomes the densest concentration of capital, media, and commercial decision-makers on any sports calendar. The paddock fills with fund managers, tech founders, and brand executives who would never attend a crypto conference but will happily take a hospitality pass at Sainte Devote.

Rafique has spoken openly about targeting the “crypto curious,” a segment that skews younger, is digitally native, and is reachable through sports culture in ways that programmatic ads and exchange banner campaigns cannot reach. OKX’s partnership with McLaren sits inside a broader portfolio that includes Manchester City (a reported $70 million sleeve deal), a LIV Golf team, and the Tribeca Film Festival. The exchange has declined to disclose the value of the McLaren deal. Given that F1 sponsorship pricing has climbed sharply in recent years, primary partner placements at a team of McLaren’s profile likely run well into eight figures annually.

Senna as Strategy

The livery choice was surgical. OKX launched its Brazilian exchange in the months before Monaco, and Senna remains the country’s most beloved sporting figure by a wide margin. A tribute campaign at Monaco lets OKX associate itself with that emotional register across every market F1 reaches, while landing hardest in the one where it just opened for business.

Both Lando Norris and Oscar Piastri wore custom Senna-inspired overalls for the weekend. Both drivers were born years after Senna’s death at Imola in 1994, and both cite him as an influence. That generational bridge is precisely what Rafique has described as OKX’s role in the partnership: connecting younger fans to McLaren’s deep history while embedding a crypto brand in that narrative.

Previous OKX livery activations followed the same playbook. The “Future Mode” redesign in 2022 and “Stealth Mode” at the 2023 Singapore Grand Prix each generated outsized social engagement relative to a standard weekend, and each gave OKX co-ownership of a visual moment that travels far beyond the broadcast window.

Why the F1 Media Model Works for Crypto

Rafique has been blunt about one thing: the McLaren sponsorship outperforms traditional media buys for OKX. The reasoning is structural.

F1 broadcasts across more than 180 countries over a calendar that spans roughly nine months. A single partnership delivers continuous global exposure without the regulatory patchwork that crypto companies face when buying media market by market. In jurisdictions where exchange advertising is restricted or outright banned, an F1 car still appears on screen. That regulatory arbitrage, available to any global series sponsor, carries particular value for an industry where advertising channels have narrowed since FTX collapsed in November 2022.

The sport’s audience composition helps too. F1 skews younger and more international than most major sports properties. For a crypto exchange chasing user acquisition in its twenties-and-thirties demographic, a 24-race season embedded in culture and content delivers compound exposure that a Super Bowl spot, for all its raw reach, cannot replicate across geographies and across months.

McLaren’s Commercial Machine

Zak Brown and Louise McEwen have built McLaren’s commercial operation into one of the most aggressive in the paddock. The team has stacked financial, tech, and consumer brands across its car, race suits, garage branding, and digital assets with a layering strategy that lets multiple sponsors coexist in the same category. McLaren was also the first F1 team to embed digital display panels on its cars, partnering with Seamless Digital in 2022 to run e-ink screens alongside the cockpit that can rotate sponsor branding in real time during a session. That kind of inventory innovation directly increases the commercial surface area available to partners like OKX.

The team’s trajectory on track has amplified the commercial story. McLaren spent years fighting in the midfield. By early 2024, Norris and Piastri were regularly challenging for podiums, and the car’s development curve looked steep. Rafique acknowledged the appeal directly, calling McLaren’s climb from the back of the grid to consistent front-running performance “incredible” and describing the decision to stay alongside the team through that arc as a deliberate bet on momentum.

What Drive to Survive Actually Changed

Netflix’s “Drive to Survive” comes up in nearly every conversation about F1’s commercial growth, and for good reason. The series, launched in 2019, pulled an entirely new audience segment into the sport, one that cared about personality, rivalry, and narrative as much as lap times. U.S. television viewership climbed 67% after the show premiered. The downstream effect on sponsorship was immediate: brands that had never considered motorsport saw a younger, engaged, content-hungry fanbase and started writing checks.

For crypto companies specifically, the timing was ideal. Drive to Survive’s audience overlapped almost perfectly with the demographic profile exchanges wanted to reach. OKX, Crypto.com (which sponsors the Miami Grand Prix and previously held Aston Martin’s title sponsorship), and others entered the grid during this window. The FTX implosion in late 2022 spooked some brands and prompted F1 to tighten its diligence process, but the exchanges that survived, including OKX, found that the reputational cleanup actually made the sport a more valuable partner. Being associated with McLaren, a team founded in 1963 with three decades of championship history, provides a kind of institutional credibility that no amount of influencer marketing can manufacture.

The Trade Show Effect

Enterprise brands use F1 sponsorship differently. HP, which joined the grid as a team sponsor, deploys its F1 assets at trade shows and partner events where a McLaren car on the booth floor signals scale, ambition, and commercial prestige to prospects and competitors alike. It draws foot traffic. It starts conversations that a product demo alone cannot.

OKX operates in a parallel register. Its activations at race weekends, including the Singapore Grand Prix fan event that Rafique cited as a standout, serve both consumer marketing and B2B credibility purposes, signaling to institutional partners and regulators that the exchange operates at a tier above the crowded field of smaller platforms.

Where This Goes

The crypto industry’s relationship with F1 is maturing. The initial land grab, when exchanges flush with bull-market capital plastered logos on anything with wheels, has given way to something more deliberate. The companies still standing are those that built genuine operational partnerships with their teams, invested in activations that went beyond logo exposure, and treated the sponsorship as a multi-year brand architecture project.

OKX appears to understand this. The Senna campaign was expensive to produce, complex to coordinate across McLaren Racing, McLaren Automotive, and Senna Global, and designed to generate emotional resonance rather than direct conversion. That is the behavior of a company playing a long game with its F1 investment.

If McLaren’s on-track performance continues to improve through 2024, OKX’s bet gets cheaper in hindsight with every podium. The exchange locked in its deal when the team was still climbing. Sponsors who arrive after the championship fight starts pay a premium. The ones who backed the team during the rebuild collect the upside.

Expect OKX to stay. Expect the activations to get bigger. And expect other crypto companies watching from the sidelines to regret waiting.

Share